Sun Pharma stock rises after US court verdict – Business Standard


Sun Pharma stock rises after US court verdictPress Trust Of India / Mumbai Apr 19, 2012, 00:49 IST

The stock of the country’s most-valued drug maker, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, closed with over two per cent gain on bourses, after a favourable verdict from the US Supreme Court in its patent case against Novo Nordisk.

The US Supreme Court ruled in favour of the company’s subsidiary, Caraco Pharmaceutical Labora-tories, in its patent litigation against Novo Nordisk over Caraco’s generic version of prandin, repaglinide tablets, used for treating diabetes.

Shares in Sun Pharma surged 2.8 per cent to Rs 600.5, its 52-week high on the Bombay Stock Exchange. The stock finally closed 2.1 per cent up at Rs 596.6. A similar movement was witnessed on the National Stock Exchange, where the stock opened at Rs 588.05, surged to an intra-day high of Rs 601.5, and finally closed at Rs 598 — a gain of 2.27 per cent.

The market capitalisation of the company increased to Rs 61,775 crore from Rs 60,020 crore yesterday.

The market capitalisation of the company increased to Rs 61,775 crore from Rs 60,020 crore yesterday.

Prandin is a registered trademark of Denmark-based drug firm Novo Nordisk and has annual US sales of about $230 million.

 Discussion Board / User Comments  

View the original article here

Fear of revenue loss dissuades discoms from providing open access – Business Standard


Fear of revenue loss dissuades discoms from providing open accessSanjay Jog / Mumbai Apr 30, 2012, 00:50 IST

A power ministry directive last week to the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) has once again exposed the reluctance of Maharashtra’s power distribution companies to provide open access to consumers of electricity in the category of 1 megawatt and above.

Discoms, which are currently reeling under an acute financial crisis, fear a big revenue loss. For, it is the industry consumers who subsidise agriculture consumers and those with power demand up to 100 units. This situation my force the government to increase subsidy. All the same, its possibility is remote because the government finances itself are in a precarious condition.

Discoms, thus, believe they will lose the freedom to negotiate tariff and terms with existing supplier or switch to alternate supplier. A situation where all 1-Mw-and-above consumers are suddenly forced to seek power through open access would, according to discoms, gift them with uncertainty in terms of recovery of cost of long-term procurement of power.

The Power ministry, which exercised powers under Section 107 of the Electricity Act, 2003, has asked the CERC to take steps in framing of appropriate regulations to implement provision of open access.

The commission, in its reply, has told the power ministry that the issues pertaining to open access for consumers under Section 42 of the Act, are under the jurisdiction of the state electricity regulatory commissions (SERCs).

According to MahaVitaran official, discoms should be relieved from providing hot standby power in the event of a breakdown.

A senior official of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company (MahaVitaran) says SERCs need to calculate a cross-subsidy surcharge based on the assumptions that the power available as a result of exit of open access consumer would be sold at the average revenue realisation rate.

“The consumer needs to pay cross-subsidy charges which are varying from 18 paise in the case of Assam to Rs 1.30 in the case of Andhra Pradesh,” he reveals.

“A number of states like Maharashtra and Punjab have earlier arrived at cross-subsidy charges as zero, but later on they recalculated and increased them to 94 paise in the case of Maharashtra and Rs 1 in the case of Punjab.”

Indian Energy Exchange says the power ministry’s directive would lend relief to the retail consumers, as the cost of procurement will come down. “This will result in bringing down the tariff,” according to Jayant Deo, its MD and CEO. To him, the fears expressed by discoms are unfounded. Deo says cross-subsidy surcharge and other surcharges will compensate them with any losses on account of migration of open access consumers.

Power analyst D Radhakrishna says all consumers above 1 Mw of power consumption are today eligible to source power at a competitive rates. However, consumers are wary that approaching market may lead to hostile treatment from local distribution companies.

Also, in the case of a line breakdown and transformer failures, the requirement of power supplies would be adversely affected although all regulators have defined and laid codes like the Standard of Performance. “But they would be treated as alien consumers,” he notes. “They may not get uniform treatment.”

 Discussion Board / User Comments  

View the original article here